Chest X-ray and staging CT in cancer
What a chest X-ray can and can't exclude, the cancer patterns to recognise, how a contrast staging CT of chest, abdomen and pelvis is read, nodal and adrenal thresholds, and measuring response with RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST, with a worked example.
Tier 1Medical sciences conceptFree sample
Written with AI assistance and fact-checked against the sources below. For exam study, not clinical decisions. How notes are made
At a glance
- Chest X-ray is a first test, not an exclusion test. A normal film in a symptomatic smoker doesn't rule out lung cancer.
- CT chest, abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast (portal venous phase) is the standard staging scan for most solid tumours. Brain imaging is added for lung cancer, melanoma and neurological symptoms, with MRI preferred to CT.
- Size criteria are crude. Nodal stage is decided by PET-CT and sampling, not CT alone.
- RECIST 1.1 measures response in trials and in practice; iRECIST adapts it for immunotherapy.
PET, MRI and bone scan are in MRI, PET and nuclear bone scan in cancer. Lung nodule and metastasis patterns are in pulmonary and pleural metastases.
Chest X-ray
What to look for in a patient with known or suspected cancer:
| Finding | Think of |
|---|---|
| Mass or nodule, spiculated | Primary lung cancer |
| Multiple round nodules ("cannonball") | Metastases: renal, sarcoma, colorectal, testicular, melanoma |
| Lobar collapse, raised hemidiaphragm | Central obstructing tumour; phrenic nerve invasion |
| Unilateral effusion, no shift or shift toward it | Malignant effusion with collapse, or mesothelioma |
| Widened mediastinum, right paratracheal mass | Nodal disease, lymphoma, SVC obstruction |
| Fine reticular lines, Kerley B lines | Lymphangitis carcinomatosa |
| Lytic rib lesion, pathological fracture | Bone metastasis, myeloma |
| Pneumothorax after chemotherapy | Cavitating or sarcoma metastases |
- Sensitivity for lung cancer in symptomatic people is about 77 to 80% (Bradley 2019). Tumours hide behind the heart, at the hila, in the apices and below the diaphragm dome.
- The lung cancer optimal care pathway treats unexplained haemoptysis as needing urgent investigation and referral, along with persistent symptoms (over 3 weeks) or a suspicious film. A normal film doesn't end the work-up: with persistent symptoms or haemoptysis, especially in an older smoker, arrange a CT chest.
- Screening uses low-dose CT, not X-ray. The National Lung Cancer Screening Program (from July 2025) offers CT every 2 years to people aged 50 to 70 with at least 30 pack-years who smoke or quit within 10 years.
Staging CT, step by step
Technique: IV iodinated contrast, portal venous phase. Arterial phase is added for hepatocellular carcinoma and neuroendocrine liver metastases; CT colonography or rectal MRI for local rectal staging.
- Primary: size, invasion of adjacent structures (T stage).
- Nodes: short axis over 10 mm is "enlarged" in most stations (over 6 mm for retrocrural, over 15 mm for jugulodigastric). CT has sensitivity about 55% and specificity about 81% for mediastinal nodal metastases in NSCLC.
- Lungs: nodules. Fleischner rules don't apply to patients with cancer.
- Liver: hypodense metastases; lesions under 1 cm are often "too small to characterise" and need MRI or follow-up.
- Adrenals: unenhanced 10 HU or less is a lipid-rich adenoma. Otherwise the options are FDG PET-CT, MRI chemical shift, washout CT (absolute washout 60% or more suggests adenoma) or sampling. The ESE/ENSAT 2023 incidentaloma guideline gives washout CT a limited role; in a patient with cancer, FDG PET-CT or sampling is usually more useful. See adrenal incidentaloma.
- Bones: lytic or sclerotic lesions on bone windows.
- Serosa: peritoneal nodules, omental cake, ascites, pleural thickening.
- Incidental findings that need action: pulmonary embolism (treat as symptomatic, see cancer-associated thromboembolism), hydronephrosis, impending cord compression.
Contrast safety (RANZCR): check eGFR. Risk of contrast-associated AKI is low above an eGFR of 30; below 30, weigh the benefit and give IV hydration if appropriate. Metformin needs to be withheld only if eGFR is under 30 or AKI is present. A previous moderate or severe reaction calls for an alternative test or premedication under radiology guidance.
Measuring response: RECIST 1.1
Baseline: pick up to 5 target lesions (2 per organ), each 10 mm or more in longest diameter (nodes 15 mm or more short axis). Record the sum of diameters. Everything else is non-target.
| Category | Definition |
|---|---|
| Complete response | All lesions gone; nodes under 10 mm short axis |
| Partial response | Sum down 30% or more from baseline |
| Progressive disease | Sum up 20% or more from the smallest sum (nadir) and at least 5 mm, or unequivocal non-target progression, or any new lesion |
| Stable disease | Neither |
Worked example
Baseline: liver lesion 40 mm, liver lesion 30 mm, lung nodule 20 mm. Sum 90 mm. Week 9: 25, 20 and 12 mm. Sum 57 mm. Week 18: 30, 24 and 15 mm. Sum 69 mm. No new lesions.
- Week 9: 57/90 is a 37% fall, a partial response. The nadir is now 57 mm.
- Week 18: 69 mm is 12 mm (21%) above the nadir, though still below baseline. That meets progressive disease. Progression is measured from the nadir, not baseline.
iRECIST for immunotherapy
- Pseudoprogression (growth or new lesions from immune infiltrate, then response) occurs in under 10% of patients, more in melanoma.
- First progression is iUPD (unconfirmed). If the patient is clinically stable, continue treatment and rescan in 4 to 8 weeks. Further growth confirms iCPD.
- Don't continue through suspected progression if performance status is falling.
When it changes management
- Resectability: a single liver metastasis from colorectal cancer may still be curable; peritoneal disease usually changes the plan.
- Stage migration: contralateral nodes, adrenal metastasis or pleural nodularity convert curative to palliative intent, but sample before denying surgery if the finding is solitary.
- Response: PD on RECIST triggers a change of line; SD on immunotherapy may mean continue.
Pitfalls
- Treating a normal chest X-ray as reassurance in persistent haemoptysis.
- Calling nodes malignant or benign on size alone.
- Measuring progression from baseline instead of the nadir.
- Stopping immunotherapy at the first new lesion in a well patient.
- Missing an incidental PE on a staging scan.
Finished reading?
Sources
- Eisenhauer EA et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45:228-47European Journal of Cancer (EORTC RECIST Working Group), 1.1 (current version on recist.eortc.org, checked November 2026)
- Seymour L et al. iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:e143-52The Lancet Oncology, 2017
- Bradley SH et al. Sensitivity of chest X-ray for detecting lung cancer in people presenting with symptoms: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2019;69:e827-35British Journal of General Practice, 2019
- Optimal care pathway for people with lung cancerAU/NZCancer Council Australia and Cancer Australia, 2nd edition (current, checked November 2026)
- RANZCR Iodinated Contrast GuidelinesAU/NZRoyal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists
- National Lung Cancer Screening ProgramAU/NZAustralian Government Department of Health, Disability and Ageing, From 1 July 2025
- Silvestri GA et al. Methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2013;143(5 Suppl):e211S-50SAmerican College of Chest Physicians, 2013
- Last updated
- 14 November 2026
What changed
- 14 November 2026 Turnstile bot check on sign-in and signed-out feedback